Seasonal trading
Drawn through the trough and repaid through the peak, year after year, without a new application each time. This is the pattern the instrument was built around.
A line of credit is approved once and used repeatedly. Interest is charged on what is drawn rather than on the limit, which is the property that makes it the right shape for a need that keeps returning.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$150/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$60,000 drawn at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
The mechanism
A limit of $150,000 is approved and nothing happens until the business draws on it. Drawing $60,000 to cover a stock purchase leaves $90,000 of headroom and starts interest accruing on $60,000, calculated daily on the balance outstanding.
Two months later a customer pays and the business repays $40,000. Interest now accrues on $20,000, the headroom is back to $130,000, and no application, approval or documentation was involved in either the drawing or the repayment.
Nothing else in business finance behaves that way. A term facility repaid early is gone, and a business that finds it needs the money again is starting a new application. A line of credit is arranged once and used for as long as the lender keeps it in place.
Draw
When it is needed
Interest
Daily, on the balance
Repay
When cash allows
Headroom
Restored on repayment
Worked example
A distributor holds a $150,000 line at an indicative 13%, with a 0.5% annual line fee on the limit. Drawings peak at $120,000 in the two months before its busiest season and fall to nothing for four months after it. The average drawn balance across the year is around $60,000.
Interest on that average is roughly $7,800. The line fee on the full limit is $750 whether or not the money is used, and an establishment fee applied in the first year adds a few hundred more. The total is in the order of $8,600 for a facility that was available in full every day of the year.
The comparison worth making is against a $150,000 term loan at the same rate, which would cost roughly $19,500 in interest for the year because it charges on the whole amount throughout. The line costs less than half as much and does the same job, and the difference is entirely in what the interest is charged on.
Illustrative figures
Illustrative on stated assumptions and rounded. Not a quote or offer of credit.
The charges
A facility quoted as a rate alone is describing part of the cost. The second column is what makes two offers comparable.
| Charge | Calculated on | Applies when |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | The drawn balance, daily | Only while drawn |
| Line or facility fee | The approved limit | Always, drawn or not |
| Establishment fee | The facility, once | At the outset |
| Review or renewal fee | The facility | At each periodic review |
| Unarranged excess fee | A balance above the limit | Only if exceeded |
| Security and registration costs | Disbursements | Where security is taken |
Indicative charge structures across the New Zealand market. Any particular facility is priced by its lender.
The line fee
A line fee is charged on the whole approved limit regardless of usage, because the lender has committed capital it cannot lend elsewhere. On a large limit that is rarely used, the fee can be most of the annual cost, and a business holding a facility purely as insurance is paying for the insurance rather than for money.
That is a legitimate thing to pay for. The question worth asking is whether the limit is sized to what the business might need or to what it was offered, because a limit twice the size of any drawing the business has ever made is charging twice the fee for the same protection.
It also means the arithmetic on a low-use facility is different from the arithmetic on a heavily used one. A business drawing continuously is paying mostly interest and should compare on rate. A business drawing rarely is paying mostly line fee and should compare on that.
Against the alternatives
The differences are structural rather than about price alone, and they point at quite different needs.
| Feature | Line of credit | Term loan | Invoice finance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Available after repayment | Yes | No | Yes, per invoice |
| Interest charged on | The drawn balance | The whole amount | The advance |
| Repayment | At the businessโs discretion | On a schedule | As customers pay |
| Cost when unused | The line fee | Full interest | Standing fees |
| Limit grows with the business | Only at review | No | Yes, with the ledger |
| Suits a need that is | Recurring and variable | One-off and sized | Caused by payment terms |
The first two rows carry the decision. A business borrowing for a recurring need on a term facility is repaying money it will want again, and paying interest on the whole amount for the whole period while it does.
Who it suits
Drawn through the trough and repaid through the peak, year after year, without a new application each time. This is the pattern the instrument was built around.
Buying, holding and selling on a repeating rhythm. The limit funds each cycle and clears as the stock converts, which is the cleanest use of a revolving facility.
A limit held largely undrawn, so the cost is the line fee rather than interest. Cheap insurance against a month nobody planned for.
Project work, milestone billing or anything where revenue arrives in irregular blocks against steady costs. The limit absorbs the timing without a schedule fighting it.
The discipline it demands
The absence of a repayment schedule is the flexibility being bought, and it is also the risk. A business that draws to a limit and never comes back down is carrying permanent debt at a revolving rate, without the discipline of a schedule forcing it down and without the lower rate a term facility would have offered for the same permanence. A limit that clears at some point in every cycle is behaving as intended. One that has not been below eighty percent for two years is telling the business something worth acting on.
The process
Generalised rather than specific to any lender.
01
What limit is being asked for and what it is for. A limit justified by a described cash cycle reads very differently from one justified by a round number, and the difference shows in what is offered.
02
Bank statements first, because a lender assessing a revolving facility is looking at how the account behaves rather than at a single repayment. Financial statements and management accounts come in at larger amounts.
Documents commonly required
03
Whether the limit is secured, and over what. A general security agreement is common even on facilities described as unsecured, and where property security is taken the process lengthens considerably.
Documents commonly required
04
The limit, the rate, the line fee and the review cycle. The review terms are the part most often skimmed and the part that determines how much the business can rely on the facility.
No timings appear here. They vary by lender, by amount, by whether security is taken and by how complete the file is, and a page naming a number would be describing a promise nobody made.
When it goes wrong
A lender can lower or withdraw a limit on the terms in the agreement, and it is most likely to do so when the businessโs position has weakened, which is when the facility matters most.
What happens:Funding disappearing at the point it is most needed, from a provision that was there all along.
Continuous drawing without repayment converts a flexible facility into permanent debt at a revolving rate, with no schedule to force it down.
What happens:A higher cost than a term facility would have carried for the same money, and a weaker position at the next review.
An automatic payment or a direct debit taking the balance above the limit attracts an excess fee and, more importantly, is visible to the lender as a control failure.
What happens:A small cost and a poor signal, both avoidable by watching headroom rather than the balance.
The first of these is the argument for not treating a revolving limit as permanent capital. It is available until it is not, and the terms on which it can be changed are in the agreement.
The honest limit
It funds timing. Where a business is profitable and waiting, a limit bridges the wait at a cost proportional to how long and how much, which is a good trade. Where the business is not profitable, a limit funds the shortfall repeatedly and quietly, and the absence of a repayment schedule removes the signal that would otherwise force the question.
That is the specific risk of the instrument. A term loan announces a problem when it cannot be repaid. A revolving facility absorbs the same problem for months without saying anything, and the balance simply drifts up.
The remedy is a number rather than a rule. Watching the lowest drawn balance in each quarter, rather than the highest, shows whether the facility is revolving or accumulating, and it is the single most useful measure a business holding one can keep.
The cost while drawn
A revolving facility charges on what is drawn rather than on the limit, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance. The line fee sits on top of it. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$150/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$60,000 drawn at 13.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
Context for why indicative rate bands move over time rather than being fixed figures.
The regulator whose guidance covers lender conduct and fee disclosure.
Backs the description of the general security interest a facility ordinarily registers.
Where a New Zealand lenderโs registration can be confirmed before an application is made.
Backs the distinction between general information of this kind and regulated financial advice.
FAQ
An approved limit a business can draw against and repay at will, with interest charged only on the balance outstanding. Repaying restores the headroom, so the facility is available again without a new application.
A term loan advances a fixed amount and repays it to zero on a schedule, charging interest on the whole amount throughout. A line charges only on what is drawn and stays available after repayment, which is why it suits a recurring need and a term loan does not.
The line fee, charged on the approved limit regardless of usage, plus any review or renewal charge. On a large limit that is rarely used the fee can be most of the annual cost.
Ordinarily not. Repayment is at the businessโs discretion, which is the flexibility being bought. Some facilities require the balance to clear entirely at least once a year, and that condition is set out in the agreement.
Yes, on the terms in the agreement. A lender can lower or withdraw a limit, most often when the businessโs position has weakened, which is precisely when the facility is most wanted. Reading those terms before relying on the limit is worth the ten minutes.
From the trading position, the security offered and the purpose described. A limit justified by a described cash cycle ordinarily fares better than one justified by a round number, because the lender can see what it is sizing against.
It varies. Many business lines carry a general security agreement over the business, and larger or cheaper facilities are frequently secured over property. A personal guarantee is common on unsecured limits.
An excess fee ordinarily applies and the lender sees the excess. Neither consequence is severe on its own, and both are avoidable by monitoring headroom rather than the balance, particularly where automatic payments are scheduled.
At some point in a normal cycle, ideally. A facility that clears periodically is revolving as intended. One that has not been substantially down for a long period is functioning as permanent debt at a revolving rate, which costs more than a term facility would have.
It can, and it is ordinarily the wrong instrument. An asset held for years financed on a limit that revolves means permanent drawing against a facility priced for temporary use, and asset lending secured on the asset itself will generally cost less.
Periodically, on a cycle set in the agreement, commonly annually. The review looks at the trading position and the usage pattern, and a facility that has been used and cleared through several cycles reviews considerably better than one that has sat at the limit.
No. It describes how a facility works in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and whether a line suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.
Related
Business overdraft
The bank version, sitting on the trading account.
Read onRevolving credit facility
The wider term, and what else it covers.
Read onAgainst a term loan
The comparison that decides most cases.
Read onInterest and fees
What is charged, and on what base.
Read onAll eight facilities
Every revolving arrangement compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A revolving facility is a standing commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the interest and fees recur for as long as it is held. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.