Skip to content
Lineofcredit.org.nz
Electric vans parked in a row beside wall-mounted charging points
How a limit is used

Draw to buy, repay when it sells.

A stock cycle is the cleanest use a revolving facility has, because the drawing and the repayment are both tied to something specific and both happen on a known rhythm.

Last reviewed 8 September 2026

Indicative interest cost

Weekly

Disclaimer

$175/week

$758 /month $9,100 a year while drawn
$160,000
$5,000 $500,000
$70,000
Nothing drawn Fully drawn
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

The short version

Five lines about the cycle.

  • The turn rate sets the cost. The same dollar drawn against stock that turns six times a year costs half what it costs against stock that turns three times.
  • Supplier terms come first. Every day of supplier credit is a day the facility does not have to fund, and it costs nothing to use.
  • A cycle that empties is working. The facility should return to zero or close to it between cycles, and a balance that persists is funding stock that is not moving.
  • Draw per purchase, not to the limit. Drawing what a specific order costs keeps the arithmetic visible and stops the facility becoming a general balance.
  • Indicative only. Every figure here is illustrative and no facility is offered here. Terms come from a lender after assessment.

The cycle

What a clean stock cycle looks like on a facility.

Stock is ordered and the supplier gives thirty days. Nothing is drawn during those thirty days, because the supplier is funding the position, which is the cheapest funding available and the reason the first step is always the supplier conversation rather than the lender one.

When the invoice falls due, the facility is drawn to pay it. Interest starts accruing on that amount from that day, and it accrues until the stock has sold and the customer has paid. The length of that period is what the facility actually costs.

As the stock converts, the facility is repaid and the headroom returns for the next order. A business running this pattern well fills and empties the facility several times a year, and the average drawn balance is a fraction of the total value of stock bought.

Order placed

Supplier terms start

Invoice due

Facility drawn

Stock sells

Cash arrives

Facility repaid

Headroom restored

Worked example

The same $160,000 of purchases, at two turn rates.

A retailer buys $160,000 of stock a year. Where the stock turns six times, the average holding is about $27,000 and the facility, drawn after thirty days of supplier terms, carries an average balance of roughly $18,000. At an indicative 13% that is about $2,340 a year.

Where the same $160,000 turns twice, the average holding is around $80,000 and the average drawn balance is roughly $70,000. The same facility at the same rate now costs about $9,100 a year, nearly four times as much for identical purchases.

The difference is entirely in how long the goods sit. That is why the useful response to a rising facility cost is almost never a conversation about the rate, and almost always a conversation about which ranges are slow and whether they should still be bought at the same volume.

Illustrative figures

Annual purchases
$160,000
At six turns, average drawn
~$18,000
Cost a year
~$2,340
At two turns, average drawn
~$70,000
Cost a year
~$9,100

Illustrative on stated assumptions and rounded. Not a quote or offer of credit.

Reducing what the facility carries

Four levers, cheapest first.

Each of these reduces the average drawn balance without changing what is bought or sold, and the first two cost nothing.

01

Supplier terms

Every day of supplier credit is a day the facility does not fund. Moving from payment on delivery to thirty days removes a month of interest from every cycle at no cost.

02

Listing and clearing faster

Goods sitting in a back room waiting to be booked in or listed are funded and unsellable. The days lost there are entirely within the businessโ€™s control.

03

Buying more often in smaller quantities

A higher unit cost against a lower average holding is frequently the better trade once funding and holding costs are counted, particularly on slow ranges.

04

Stopping the slow ranges

The ranges consuming most of the facility contribute least of the margin, and they are usually the ones nobody wants to stop buying. Measuring drawn balance by range makes the argument concrete.

The signal to watch

A stock facility that never empties is funding stock that never sold.

The whole point of the pattern is that each cycle clears. Where a residual balance persists cycle after cycle, that residue corresponds to inventory that has not converted, and the facility is quietly financing a growing pile of goods at a revolving rate. The response is not a larger limit. It is an honest look at what is on the shelves, because the facility has already told the business which ranges are the problem by refusing to come back down.

Instrument choice

Where a revolving limit beats the alternatives for stock.

Stock funding is one of the clearest cases for a revolving facility, and the exceptions are worth knowing.

FeatureRevolving limitTerm loanSupplier terms
Cost while stock is unsoldInterest on what is drawnInterest on the whole amountNothing, within terms
Available for the next orderYes, once repaidNoYes, within the limit
Covers goods from any supplierYesYesNo, only that supplier
Requires an application each timeNoYesNo
Suits a one-off large buildReasonablyWellRarely large enough

A one-off, large, defined build with a long conversion period is the case where a term facility can be better, because the money is genuinely needed for the whole period and a term rate is lower. Everything repeating belongs on a limit.

Running it well

Three habits that keep a stock facility honest.

  1. 01

    Draw per order, not to the limit

    Transferring exactly what an order costs, rather than topping the account up, keeps the connection between the drawing and the goods visible. It also makes it obvious when a drawing has not been repaid by the time that stock should have converted.

  2. 02

    Repay when the stock converts, not when convenient

    Cash from a sale that stays in the account rather than reducing the facility is costing interest for no reason. On a facility charged daily, repaying the week the money lands rather than at month end is a real saving repeated every cycle.

  3. 03

    Reconcile the balance against the shelves quarterly

    The drawn balance should correspond roughly to stock bought and not yet sold. Where the balance is materially higher than the value of unsold goods, the facility has drifted into funding something else, and finding out which quarter that started is considerably easier than finding out two years later.

The pattern

What a revolving limit does well here, and what it does not.

What it does well

  • Charges only for the period stock is actually held and unsold
  • Restores headroom for the next order without a new application
  • Funds purchases from any supplier rather than only one
  • Scales across several cycles a year without renegotiation
  • Makes the cost of slow-moving stock visible as an interest line

What it does not

  • Improve a buying decision, which is where the real risk sits
  • Cover holding costs beyond funding, which are frequently larger
  • Force repayment when stock stops converting
  • Distinguish between stock funding and general drawing once the two are mixed
  • Help where the underlying problem is margin rather than timing

The honest limit

A facility funds a purchase and cannot improve it.

Every risk in this pattern reduces to whether the stock sells. Where it does, the facility is doing exactly what it should and the cost is proportional to the wait. Where it does not, the business is holding goods it has to discount and a balance it still has to repay, and no funding structure changes that.

That makes the buying decision more important than the funding one, and it is worth more scrutiny than it usually gets. An unproven range bought in volume because the facility had headroom is a bet placed with borrowed money, and the facility made it easier rather than wiser.

The discipline that keeps this honest is small. Draw against specific orders, repay as they convert, and check quarterly that the balance still corresponds to goods on the shelves. A facility that survives that test is funding a cycle; one that does not has become something else.

Setting it up

What a lender wants to see behind a stock limit.

A limit funding inventory is sized against the buying pattern, so the buying pattern is what the application should describe.

  1. 01

    The purchase and sales rhythm

    How often stock is bought, in what quantities, and how long it takes to sell. A lender that can see the cycle can size the limit to it, and a request without that is asking the lender to guess.

    Documents commonly required

    • Purchase history
    • Sales by period
    • Stock on hand
  2. 02

    Supplier terms

    What credit suppliers already extend, because that is funding the lender does not have to provide. A business with thirty days from its suppliers needs a materially smaller limit than one paying on delivery.

    Documents commonly required

    • Supplier terms schedule
  3. 03

    The trading picture

    Bank statements, financial statements and existing commitments, as with any facility. Stock as security is ordinarily treated cautiously, so the trading position carries more of the file than the inventory does.

    Documents commonly required

    • Bank statements
    • Financial statements where held

Lenders are ordinarily more conservative about inventory than about receivables, because its value on a forced sale is uncertain and depends on the goods. Stock frequently forms part of a security package rather than the whole of one.

A note on measurement

Days inventory outstanding, by range.

The average holding period across the whole business hides the thing worth knowing. Nearly every business has ranges that turn quickly and ranges that do not, and the slow ones are consuming most of the facility while contributing least of the margin.

Calculated per range, from inventory value against cost of goods sold for that range, the picture changes what gets bought. A range holding ninety days of stock at a thin margin is being funded for three months to produce very little, and seeing that as a number is more persuasive than any general sense that some things move slowly.

It is also the argument that makes a supplier conversation concrete. Asking for longer terms on the slow ranges specifically, rather than across the board, is a smaller request with a clearer rationale and is granted more often.

The cost of the cycle

What carrying stock on a limit costs.

A revolving facility charges on what is drawn, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance across the year. Holding costs beyond funding sit on top of it. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.

Indicative interest cost

Weekly

Disclaimer

$175/week

$758 /month $9,100 a year while drawn
$160,000
$5,000 $500,000
$70,000
Nothing drawn Fully drawn
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

References

Sources

FAQ

Funding a stock cycle, questions answered

What does a stock cycle cost on a revolving limit?

Interest on the drawn balance for as long as the goods are held and unsold. The turn rate therefore sets the cost, and the same annual purchases can cost several times as much on slow ranges as on fast ones.

Should supplier terms be used first?

Always. Every day of supplier credit is a day the facility does not fund, and it costs nothing. Drawing on a limit while a supplier invoice is not yet due is paying interest to hold money that was already free.

How much of the limit should a stock cycle use?

What the orders actually cost, drawn per order rather than as a general top-up. Keeping the drawing tied to specific goods is what makes it obvious when a cycle has not cleared.

What does a facility that never empties mean?

That stock has not converted. The residual balance corresponds to goods still on the shelves, and the response is a look at which ranges are not moving rather than a larger limit.

Is a term loan ever better for stock?

For a one-off, large, defined build with a long conversion period, sometimes, because a term rate is lower and the money is genuinely needed throughout. Anything repeating belongs on a limit.

How does turn rate affect the facility?

Directly and proportionally. Stock turning six times a year carries roughly half the average balance of stock turning three times, for identical purchases, and the interest follows.

Should sale proceeds go straight onto the facility?

Ordinarily yes. Interest accrues daily on the balance, so cash sitting in the account rather than reducing the drawing costs money for no benefit. Repaying as receipts land is a real saving repeated every cycle.

How can slow stock be identified?

By tracking days inventory outstanding by range rather than in total. The average hides the problem, and the slow ranges are consuming most of the facility while contributing least of the margin.

Does the facility cover holding costs?

It funds the purchase. Storage, insurance, handling and obsolescence are separate and frequently larger than the interest, particularly on slow-moving inventory, and they belong in any comparison of a bulk discount against holding cost.

What if a range has to be cleared at a loss?

The facility still has to be repaid, and the shortfall comes from elsewhere. That is the risk funding cannot manage, which is why the buying decision deserves more scrutiny than the funding decision.

How often should the balance be reconciled to stock?

Quarterly is enough for most businesses. The drawn balance should correspond roughly to goods bought and not yet sold, and a growing gap between the two shows the facility has drifted into funding something else.

Is this page financial advice?

No. It describes a usage pattern in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and what suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.

Disclaimer

Indicative content only. Not personalised financial advice.

A revolving facility is a standing commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the interest and fees recur for as long as it is held. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.

What this site is

A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.

What the figures show

Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.

What the lender decides

Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.

Commercial disclosure

Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.

Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.

This page is
coming soon.

Important information

About this site, the figures, and your protections.

Last reviewed 8 September 2026.

1. What this site is

Lineofcredit.org.nz is a New Zealand education site and a free repayment calculator. It is not a lender, not a broker, and not a registered financial adviser. We do not arrange credit, hold client money, or provide regulated financial advice as defined under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 6 or the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Nothing on this site is personalised financial advice.

2. The calculator and figures

All numbers shown by the calculator, in worked examples, and across the site are indicative only and modelled from the inputs entered. The figures are not a quote, not an offer of credit, and not a guarantee of the rate, fees, term, or approval available to any specific business. Final pricing, fees, and approval are set by the lender after the lender's own credit assessment.

3. General information, not advice

Content on this site is general information (class information). It does not take into account the financial situation, objectives, or needs of any particular business or person. Before making a borrowing decision, professional advice from a licensed Financial Advice Provider, a chartered accountant, or a solicitor is widely regarded as the safer frame, particularly where amounts are material or the borrowing involves a personal guarantee.

4. Commercial relationship with Prospa

When a calculator user clicks "see if you qualify", the application hands off to Prospa, our New Zealand SME finance partner. Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a referral commission from Prospa when a referred application converts to a funded loan. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and does not change the rate, fees, or terms Prospa offers the business. We do not claim Prospa is the cheapest or best lender for every applicant. Full disclosure is on our partner page.

5. Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) on this site are general in nature and subject to confirmation by the accountant on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional tax advice from a chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame. Inland Revenue is the primary source for any specific NZ tax-treatment question.

6. Privacy and personal information

Consistent with the Privacy Act 2020, we do not run lead-capture forms on this site. Calculator inputs stay in the browser and are not transmitted to a server we control. We use Google Analytics 4 for aggregate, non-personal traffic data only. When a visitor clicks through to Prospa they leave our site, and Prospa's privacy policy applies. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) framework applies at the lender level where a sole trader's borrowing is wholly or predominantly for personal use, or where a personal guarantor is involved.

7. Fair dealing posture

This site operates under the fair-dealing requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 2 and the Fair Trading Act 1986. We avoid misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, and unsubstantiated claims. Numeric or regulatory claims are hedged or sourced to a primary New Zealand authority such as Inland Revenue, MBIE, the Companies Office, WorkSafe, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Stats NZ, the Commerce Commission or the Financial Markets Authority.

8. Limitation of liability and governing law

To the maximum extent permitted by New Zealand law, Lineofcredit.org.nz, its operators and its contributors are not liable for any loss or damage (direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise) arising from use of the site or reliance on its content, indicative figures, or third-party information. These terms are governed by the laws of New Zealand. Any disputes are to be resolved in New Zealand courts.

Long form: terms, privacy, footer disclaimer.