01
A real receivables ledger
Business-to-business invoicing on credit terms. A business selling for cash has nothing to size a limit against and should be looking at a conventional line instead.
Every other limit on this site is a number a lender sets and reviews. This one is calculated from the receivables ledger, so it rises as the business wins work and falls as debt ages.
Last reviewed 8 September 2026
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$208/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$90,000 drawn at 12.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
The short version
The mechanism
The calculation begins with everything owed to the business and removes what the lender will not count. Invoices past an agreed age come out, disputed invoices and credit notes come out, related-party debt comes out, and debt owed by customers the lender will not take comes out.
What remains is capped for concentration, so no single customer can represent more of the base than the lender is comfortable with. A percentage of the surviving figure becomes the available limit, and the business draws against it as it would against any line.
The distinction from receivables funding proper is that nothing is advanced per invoice. The ledger sets the ceiling and the business borrows underneath it at its own discretion, which is a genuinely different experience from having a proportion of each invoice released as it is issued.
Start with
Gross receivables
Remove
Ineligible debt
Cap
Concentration
Advance
A percentage of the rest
Worked base
Illustrative on stated assumptions. The sequence and the direction are what matter, since every lender sets its own eligibility rules.
| Step | Adjustment | Running figure |
|---|---|---|
| Gross receivables | $400,000 | |
| Less invoices past 90 days | -$32,000 | $368,000 |
| Less disputed and credited | -$11,000 | $357,000 |
| Less related-party debt | -$9,000 | $348,000 |
| Less concentration above the cap | -$48,000 | $300,000 |
| Eligible receivables | $300,000 | |
| Limit at 70% | $210,000 available |
Illustrative borrowing base on stated assumptions. Not an offer of credit.
Reading the table
A business told it can borrow 70% against a $400,000 ledger reasonably expects $280,000. The figure that arrives is $210,000, because the percentage applies to eligible receivables rather than to the gross ledger and the eligibility rules removed a quarter of the book first.
None of that is hidden. It is set out in the agreement, and running the rules across the current aged receivables report before signing takes an hour and produces the real number. Lenders will ordinarily help with that exercise, because a facility neither party is happy with serves nobody.
The other consequence is that the limit is only as good as the ledger is clean. Old debt that is not going to be collected sits in the gross figure, contributes nothing to the base and makes every calculation less useful, which is one more reason to clear genuinely uncollectable balances off the ledger rather than carrying them, subject to the accountantโs confirmation of how that is recorded.
Against the neighbours
It borrows behaviour from both, which is the reason it is worth understanding as its own thing rather than as a version of either.
| Feature | Invoice-backed line | Conventional line | Invoice finance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limit set by | The ledger, continuously | The lender, at review | Per invoice |
| Drawing | At the businessโs discretion | At the businessโs discretion | On invoice issue |
| Repayment | At the businessโs discretion | At the businessโs discretion | When the customer pays |
| Grows with turnover | Yes, automatically | Only at review | Yes, automatically |
| Reporting burden | Moderate to high | Low | Moderate |
| Cost per dollar | Between the two | Lower where secured | Higher |
The combination it offers is discretion over drawing with a limit that scales, which neither neighbour provides. The price is the reporting, because a limit calculated from a ledger requires the ledger to be reported.
The behaviour to plan for
A month where customers pay slowly is a month where invoices cross the eligibility age and drop out of the base, so the available limit falls while the shortfall grows. That is inherent to sizing against a ledger rather than against a business, and it is the opposite of how a business intuitively expects a facility to behave. Watching the aged receivables report weekly against the eligibility rules turns it from a surprise into a forecast, and it is the single most useful habit for anyone holding this facility.
Who it suits
01
Business-to-business invoicing on credit terms. A business selling for cash has nothing to size a limit against and should be looking at a conventional line instead.
02
Concentration caps remove the excess above a single customerโs share, so a ledger dominated by one account produces a limit well below its headline.
03
The facility earns its cost where a fixed limit would keep needing to be raised. A stable business rarely needs a limit that moves.
04
An accurate aged receivables report on a schedule is what the limit is calculated from, and a business that cannot produce one reliably will find the facility unreliable.
The trade
The process
Generalised rather than specific to any lender.
01
Current and historic aged receivables reports, because the lender is interested in how the ledger behaves over time rather than how it looks today. Ageing patterns, credit note history and concentration all come from this.
Documents commonly required
02
Bank statements, financial statements and existing commitments, as with any facility. The ledger carries more of the file than it would on an unsecured line, and it does not carry all of it.
Documents commonly required
03
The advance rate, the eligibility age, the concentration cap and how often the base is resubmitted. Running the rules across the current ledger at this point gives the real limit rather than the headline one.
Documents commonly required
04
A general security agreement is ordinarily taken and registered, and where another lender holds one, that position has to be resolved first. Drawing then works as it would on any line.
Documents commonly required
The honest limit
For a stable business with a modest limit and a clean bank record, the reporting attached to a ledger-derived limit buys very little. A conventional secured line at a similar rate does the same job with no monthly submission, and the difference in administration is worth more than the difference in flexibility.
The facility earns its place where growth is the problem. A business whose limit has been raised twice in eighteen months and is about to need raising again is spending real time on applications, and a limit that moves on its own removes that friction permanently.
It is also worth being clear that it is not a substitute for receivables funding where the need is speed. A limit that reflects invoices already issued still has to be drawn deliberately, and a business that wants cash within a day of issuing an invoice is describing a different product.
Reporting in practice
On an agreed cycle, ordinarily monthly, the business submits an aged receivables report and a calculation applying the eligibility rules to it. The lender checks the arithmetic, may verify a sample of invoices, and confirms the available limit for the period ahead.
The practical requirement is an accounting system that produces an accurate aged report on demand and a person who owns the submission. Neither is exotic and both are genuinely absent in a surprising number of businesses, where the receivables ledger is reconciled quarterly at best and the aged report is generated for the accountant rather than for management.
Where that capability exists, the reporting is a half-day a month and the facility works. Where it does not, the facility is unreliable in exactly the way that matters, because a base that cannot be submitted on time can suspend availability regardless of how healthy the ledger actually is.
The ledger as an asset
Aged debt that is not going to be collected sits in the gross ledger, drops out of the eligible base, and makes every calculation less useful. Clearing it improves the accuracy of the base without changing what is actually available, which is worth doing simply for the clarity.
Reducing genuine ageing pays properly. Every invoice moved from the sixty-day column into the thirty-day column stays inside eligibility longer and contributes to the base for more of its life, which raises the available limit without any change in turnover.
That is an unusual property. On most facilities, collections work improves cash flow and nothing else. Here it improves cash flow and simultaneously raises the limit, so the same effort produces two benefits and the arithmetic in favour of doing it properly is stronger than on any other facility on this site.
The cost while drawn
The facility charges on what is drawn rather than on the limit, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance. Reporting and audit fees sit on top of it. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.
Indicative interest cost
Weekly
$208/week
Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.
Sending to Prospa
$90,000 drawn at 12.00% . Prospa will ask a few quick questions, then provide a firm quote and funding if eligible.
Redirecting…
References
Backs the description of the general security registration this facility ordinarily involves.
The register used to confirm entities and related-party relationships during a ledger review.
Context for how receivables and their impairment are presented in financial statements.
The regulator whose guidance covers lender conduct and fee disclosure.
Backs the distinction between general information of this kind and regulated financial advice.
FAQ
A revolving limit whose size is calculated from the receivables ledger rather than fixed at approval. It behaves like a line of credit in use, with drawing and repayment at the businessโs discretion and interest on the balance.
Ineligible debt is removed from the gross ledger, a concentration cap is applied to any customer above an agreed share, and a percentage of what remains becomes the available limit. The calculation is repeated as the ledger moves.
Because the percentage applies to eligible receivables rather than to the gross ledger. Aged, disputed, related-party and over-concentrated debt is removed first, which commonly reduces the base by a fifth or more.
Invoice finance advances a proportion of each invoice as it is issued. This sets a ceiling from the ledger and lets the business borrow underneath it when it chooses, which is a genuinely different experience day to day.
Invoices crossing the eligibility age, customers paying, disputes arising, or one customer growing past the concentration cap. The first of those is the one that catches businesses out, because it happens exactly when collections have slowed.
Ordinarily not. The business invoices and collects in its own name, and the lender is using the ledger to size a limit rather than collecting against it.
More than a conventional line and less than a full receivables facility. An aged receivables report on an agreed schedule is the core of it, with periodic verification, and a business that cannot produce one reliably should look at a conventional limit instead.
Less well. Concentration caps remove the excess above an agreed share, so a ledger dominated by one account produces a limit well below its headline. Establishing that cap early avoids planning around money that will not be available.
The facility is over-advanced and the agreement sets out what follows, ordinarily repayment of the excess. Watching the base against the drawn balance weekly is what prevents that arriving unannounced.
Ordinarily a general security agreement over the business, registered on the Personal Property Securities Register. Where another lender already holds one, that position has to be resolved before the facility can start.
A business selling for cash, which has no ledger to size against; a stable business with a modest limit, for which the reporting buys little; and a business wanting cash the day an invoice is issued, which is describing invoice finance instead.
No. It describes how a facility works in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and whether this suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.
Related
Business line of credit
The conventional version, with a fixed limit.
Read onSecured line of credit
The alternative where property is available.
Read onFunding a stock cycle
The pattern a moving limit suits best.
Read onWhat lenders assess
Why the ledger carries so much of this file.
Read onAll eight facilities
Every revolving arrangement compared in the same shape.
Read onDisclaimer
A revolving facility is a standing commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the interest and fees recur for as long as it is held. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.
What this site is
A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.
What the figures show
Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.
What the lender decides
Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.
Commercial disclosure
Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.
Tax, GST, and accountant framing
Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.