Skip to content
Lineofcredit.org.nz
Lighting stands and a folded backdrop in an empty studio space
How a limit is used

Drawn through the trough, cleared through the peak.

This is the pattern a revolving facility was designed for, and the one it handles best. It is also the pattern where a facility quietly stops clearing, and the sign is visible a year before it matters.

Last reviewed 8 September 2026

Indicative interest cost

Weekly

Disclaimer

$213/week

$921 /month $11,050 a year while drawn
$180,000
$5,000 $500,000
$85,000
Nothing drawn Fully drawn
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

The short version

Five lines about the seasonal curve.

  • The deepest point is not in the trough. It is at the pre-season build, when stock and staffing are paid for before any revenue has resumed.
  • The limit should be sized to that peak. A facility sized on the quiet months alone runs out at exactly the point it is most needed.
  • Arrange it in the peak. A lender assessing a seasonal business at its strongest offers different terms from one assessing it at its weakest, and it is the same business.
  • A rising floor is the warning. The least drawn the facility gets each year, plotted across three years, is the single most useful number a seasonal borrower can keep.
  • Indicative only. Every figure here is illustrative and no facility is offered here. Terms come from a lender after assessment.

The shape

What a healthy seasonal year looks like on the facility.

Through the peak the facility should be undrawn or nearly so, because revenue is arriving faster than costs. As trading falls away the drawing begins gradually, because fixed costs continue while income does not, and the balance accumulates through the quiet months at a fairly steady rate.

The deepest point comes at the pre-season build, when stock is bought, staff are hired and marketing is paid for before a dollar has come back. That is the moment the facility is doing the most work and the moment a limit sized only for the trough runs out.

Then the season starts and the balance falls quickly, because the peak generates cash faster than any other part of the year. A facility that returns to zero somewhere in that period is behaving exactly as designed, and one that stops a little short is worth paying attention to.

Peak trading

Facility at zero

Shoulder

Drawing begins

Trough

Steady accumulation

Pre-season

Deepest point

Worked example

Three years of the same facility.

A tourism operator holds a $180,000 limit. In year one the balance peaks at $140,000 in the week before the season and returns to zero in February. In year two it peaks at $150,000 and bottoms out at $12,000. In year three it peaks at $165,000 and bottoms at $34,000.

The peak figures look like the story and they are not. The important number is the floor, which went from zero to $12,000 to $34,000. That is $34,000 of permanent borrowing that the peak is no longer clearing, and it will be $50,000 or more next year if nothing changes.

Nothing in the year three figures looked alarming in isolation. The facility stayed within its limit, every payment was made, and the peak was the strongest of the three. The trend in the floor was the only place the problem was visible, and it was visible a full year before the limit would have been reached.

Illustrative figures

Limit
$180,000
Year one floor
$0
Year two floor
$12,000
Year three floor
$34,000
Year three peak
$165,000

Illustrative on stated assumptions. Not a projection for any particular business.

The number to keep

The floor matters more than the peak.

A seasonal facility is judged by whether it clears, not by how deep it goes. Recording the lowest drawn balance in each cycle, and comparing it against the two before it, takes two minutes a year and is the earliest available signal that the season has stopped covering the year. A rising floor across three cycles is telling the business something a profit and loss statement will not show for another twelve months.

Through the year

Three points where attention pays.

  1. 01

    At the peak, arrange or review

    A lender looking at the business in its strongest months sees twelve months including a peak. The same conversation in the trough shows three months of a business at its weakest. Nothing about the business differs and the terms available do, which makes timing the single most valuable decision here.

  2. 02

    Before the build, check the headroom

    The deepest drawing of the year is about to happen. Comparing the planned build against the remaining headroom, four to six weeks out, is what turns a shortfall into a conversation rather than an excess.

  3. 03

    At the bottom of the drawdown, record the floor

    One number, once a year, written down beside the two previous years. It is the whole of the early warning system for this pattern and it costs nothing to maintain.

Sizing it

Two ways to set the limit, and what each misses.

A seasonal limit sized on the wrong basis fails in a predictable way, and both failures are common.

FeatureSized on the troughSized on the pre-season peak
Covers the quiet monthsYesYes
Covers the stock and staffing buildNoYes
Runs outWeeks before trading resumesOrdinarily not
Line fee costLowerHigher
Typical outcomeAn urgent limit increaseA facility that works

The line fee on the additional headroom is the price of the second column, and it is ordinarily a few hundred dollars a year against the cost of an urgent funding conversation in the worst week of the year.

The pattern

What a revolving limit does well here, and what it does not.

What it does well

  • Charges only for the months the money is actually needed
  • Repays automatically as peak revenue arrives, with no schedule to fight
  • Stays available for the following year without a new application
  • Absorbs a season that starts late without any renegotiation
  • Costs very little in the months the business is at its strongest

What it does not

  • Force the balance down, which is what allows a floor to form
  • Grow on its own when the business grows and needs more
  • Survive a review where the position has weakened
  • Distinguish between a deep season and a structural shortfall
  • Fix a year where the peak no longer covers the trough

The honest test

What a floor that will not clear actually means.

A seasonal business is viable when the peak generates enough to cover the whole year including the trough. Where it does, the facility clears each cycle and the arrangement is stable indefinitely. Where it does not, the facility funds the difference, the floor rises, and each year starts a little further behind.

That is a business question rather than a funding one, and no limit increase answers it. The useful response to a rising floor is a full-year calculation of revenue against total cost including the funding, and then a decision about pricing, cost base or the shape of the year.

Naming it early is the whole advantage of watching the floor. A business that identifies the trend in year two has a year to act in. One that discovers it when the limit is reached has whatever time the lender allows.

The trade

What a revolving limit gives a seasonal business.

What it gives

  • A cost proportional to the months the money is actually needed
  • Automatic repayment as peak revenue arrives, with no schedule fighting it
  • Availability the following year without a fresh application
  • Tolerance for a season that starts two or three weeks late
  • A very low cost through the strongest months of the year

What it does not

  • Force the balance down, which is how a floor forms
  • Grow on its own as the business grows into a larger build
  • Survive a review conducted while the business is in its trough
  • Distinguish a deep season from a structural shortfall
  • Fix a year in which the peak no longer covers the trough

A practical note

Two seasons of statements beat any forecast.

A seasonal business planning a facility has a considerable advantage over most applicants, which is that last year already happened. Twelve months of closing balances plotted on one line gives the depth, the length and the timing of the trough more honestly than a forecast built forward from assumptions.

Two years is better again, because it shows whether the pattern is stable. Where the two curves have the same shape, the third can be planned with confidence. Where the second sits below the first throughout, the business has a trend rather than a season and the facility conversation should reflect that.

It takes an hour with a spreadsheet and it produces the single most useful document a seasonal business can put in front of a lender, which is a picture of its own year with the requirement marked on it.

The conversation with a lender

What a seasonal business should present.

Two years of monthly closing balances on one line, with the trough and the pre-season build marked, is the single most persuasive document a seasonal business can put in front of a lender. It shows the pattern, the depth and the timing without any argument being made, and it demonstrates that the business understands its own year.

Alongside it, the peak requirement calculated rather than estimated, and a statement of when the facility is expected to clear. A lender that can see a predicted pattern and then watch it happen has a far easier review conversation twelve months later.

What that presentation is really doing is removing the lenderโ€™s uncertainty about seasonality, which is otherwise the thing that makes a seasonal file harder than a steady one. A business that names its trough before being asked about it is treating the pattern as ordinary, which is what it is.

The cost of the drawdown

What carrying the seasonal balance costs.

A revolving facility charges on what is drawn, so this shows the interest cost of an average drawn balance across the year rather than a repayment. Indicative only, and not a quote or offer of credit.

Indicative interest cost

Weekly

Disclaimer

$213/week

$921 /month $11,050 a year while drawn
$180,000
$5,000 $500,000
$85,000
Nothing drawn Fully drawn
13.00% p.a.
8% (secured) 30% (unsecured)

Indicative only. Not a quote or offer of credit. Actual rates, fees, and repayments depend on the business profile and the lender's decision.

References

Sources

FAQ

Smoothing seasonal cash flow, questions answered

When is a seasonal facility deepest?

At the pre-season build rather than in the trough, because stock, staffing and marketing are paid for before any revenue resumes. A limit sized only on the quiet months runs out at exactly that point.

How should a seasonal limit be sized?

On the peak requirement, which is the accumulated shortfall through the quiet months plus the pre-season build. Last yearโ€™s bank statements give both figures more honestly than a forecast built forward.

When should a seasonal facility be arranged?

During the peak, for use in the following trough. A lender assessing the business at its strongest is looking at a different picture from one assessing it at its weakest, and the terms differ accordingly.

What is the floor and why does it matter?

The lowest drawn balance reached in each cycle. Rising across three years, it shows that the peak is no longer clearing the year, which is visible a full year before the limit would be reached.

Should the facility return to zero every year?

Ideally yes. A facility that clears in the peak is revolving as intended. One that stops a little short each year is accumulating permanent debt at a revolving rate, which costs more than a term facility would.

What if the season starts late?

The facility absorbs it, which is one of its genuine advantages. The cost is more interest for the additional weeks, and the risk is the extended drawing meeting a limit sized without tolerance.

Is a term loan ever better for seasonality?

Rarely. A term loan charges interest on the whole amount for the whole year including the peak months when nothing is needed, and it has to be reapplied for the following year.

What does a rising floor call for?

A full-year calculation of revenue against total cost including funding, and then a decision about pricing, the cost base or the shape of the year. A limit increase does not answer it.

Can a lender reduce the limit mid-season?

On the terms in the agreement, yes, and it is most likely where the position has weakened. That is one more reason not to treat a seasonal limit as permanent capital and to know the review terms.

Does the line fee make a larger limit uneconomic?

Rarely. The additional line fee on headroom is ordinarily a few hundred dollars a year, against the cost and disruption of an urgent limit conversation in the worst week of the year.

How far ahead should the build be checked?

Four to six weeks. That is enough time for a limit conversation to happen calmly if the headroom is short, and it is the point at which the size of the build is known rather than estimated.

Is this page financial advice?

No. It describes a usage pattern in general terms. This site is not a lender, a broker or a registered financial adviser, and what suits a particular business depends on facts a website cannot see.

Disclaimer

Indicative content only. Not personalised financial advice.

A revolving facility is a standing commitment serviced out of the same operating cash flow as everything else, and the interest and fees recur for as long as it is held. Modelling the weekly cost against the trading position before committing is what this site is built for. Borrowing at a level that stays comfortable through a quiet quarter, rather than only through a strong one, is widely regarded as the safer frame.

What this site is

A calculator and information tool. Not a lender, not a broker, not a registered financial adviser. Nothing here is personalised financial advice.

What the figures show

Modelled estimates based on the inputs shown. Not a quote. Not an offer of credit. Not a guarantee of approval, rate or fees.

What the lender decides

Final rates, fees, and approval are set by the lender after a CCCFA-appropriate assessment of the applicant's circumstances and credit decision.

Commercial disclosure

Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a commission from Prospa when a visitor applies through this site and their application is approved. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and it does not influence the rate Prospa offers. Full disclosure on the partner page.

Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) are general in nature and subject to the accountant's confirmation on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional advice from a registered financial adviser or chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame.

This page is
coming soon.

Important information

About this site, the figures, and your protections.

Last reviewed 8 September 2026.

1. What this site is

Lineofcredit.org.nz is a New Zealand education site and a free repayment calculator. It is not a lender, not a broker, and not a registered financial adviser. We do not arrange credit, hold client money, or provide regulated financial advice as defined under the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 6 or the Financial Services Legislation Amendment Act 2019. Nothing on this site is personalised financial advice.

2. The calculator and figures

All numbers shown by the calculator, in worked examples, and across the site are indicative only and modelled from the inputs entered. The figures are not a quote, not an offer of credit, and not a guarantee of the rate, fees, term, or approval available to any specific business. Final pricing, fees, and approval are set by the lender after the lender's own credit assessment.

3. General information, not advice

Content on this site is general information (class information). It does not take into account the financial situation, objectives, or needs of any particular business or person. Before making a borrowing decision, professional advice from a licensed Financial Advice Provider, a chartered accountant, or a solicitor is widely regarded as the safer frame, particularly where amounts are material or the borrowing involves a personal guarantee.

4. Commercial relationship with Prospa

When a calculator user clicks "see if you qualify", the application hands off to Prospa, our New Zealand SME finance partner. Lineofcredit.org.nz earns a referral commission from Prospa when a referred application converts to a funded loan. The commission is paid by Prospa, not by the borrower, and does not change the rate, fees, or terms Prospa offers the business. We do not claim Prospa is the cheapest or best lender for every applicant. Full disclosure is on our partner page.

5. Tax, GST, and accountant framing

Tax-treatment statements (GST claim timing, interest deductibility, depreciation rates) on this site are general in nature and subject to confirmation by the accountant on the specific business position. For material amounts, professional tax advice from a chartered accountant is widely regarded as the safer frame. Inland Revenue is the primary source for any specific NZ tax-treatment question.

6. Privacy and personal information

Consistent with the Privacy Act 2020, we do not run lead-capture forms on this site. Calculator inputs stay in the browser and are not transmitted to a server we control. We use Google Analytics 4 for aggregate, non-personal traffic data only. When a visitor clicks through to Prospa they leave our site, and Prospa's privacy policy applies. The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003 (CCCFA) framework applies at the lender level where a sole trader's borrowing is wholly or predominantly for personal use, or where a personal guarantor is involved.

7. Fair dealing posture

This site operates under the fair-dealing requirements of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Part 2 and the Fair Trading Act 1986. We avoid misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, and unsubstantiated claims. Numeric or regulatory claims are hedged or sourced to a primary New Zealand authority such as Inland Revenue, MBIE, the Companies Office, WorkSafe, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Stats NZ, the Commerce Commission or the Financial Markets Authority.

8. Limitation of liability and governing law

To the maximum extent permitted by New Zealand law, Lineofcredit.org.nz, its operators and its contributors are not liable for any loss or damage (direct, indirect, consequential, or otherwise) arising from use of the site or reliance on its content, indicative figures, or third-party information. These terms are governed by the laws of New Zealand. Any disputes are to be resolved in New Zealand courts.

Long form: terms, privacy, footer disclaimer.